|
||
George
Orwell As I Please Tribune, 11 August 1944 |
||
|
||
A few days ago a West African wrote to inform us that a
certain London dance hall had recently erected a ‘colour bar’,
presumably in order to please the American soldiers who formed an important
part of its clientele. Telephone conversations with the management of the
dance hall brought us the answers: (a) that the ‘colour bar’ had been
cancelled, and (b) that it had never been imposed in the first place; but I
think one can take it that our informant’s charge had some kind of basis.
There have been other similar incidents recently. For instance, during last
week a case in a magistrate’s court brought out the fact that a West
Indian Negro working in this country had been refused admission to a place
of entertainment when he was wearing Home Guard uniform. And there have been
many instances of Indians, Negroes and others being turned away from hotels
on the ground that ‘we don’t take coloured people’. It is immensely important to be vigilant against this kind of thing, and to make as much public fuss as possible whenever it happens. For this is one of those matters in which making a fuss can achieve something. There is no kind of legal disability against coloured people in this country, and, what is more, there is very little popular colour feeling. (This is not due to any inherent virtue in the British people, as our behaviour in India shows. It is due to the fact that in Britain itself there is no colour problem.) The trouble always arises in the same way. A hotel, restaurant or what-not is frequented by people who have money to spend who object to mixing with Indians or Negroes. They tell the proprietor that unless he imposes a colour bar they will go elsewhere. They may be a very small minority, and the proprietor may not be in agreement with them, but it is difficult for him to lose good customers; so he imposes the colour bar. This kind of thing cannot happen when public opinion is on the alert and disagreeable publicity is given to any establishment where coloured people are insulted. Anyone who knows of a provable instance of colour discrimination ought always to expose it. Otherwise the tiny percentage of colour-snobs who exist among us can make endless mischief, and the British people are given a bad name which, as a whole, they do not deserve. In the nineteen-twenties, when American tourists were as much a part of the scenery of Paris as tobacco kiosks and tin urinals, the beginnings of a colour bar began to appear even in France. The Americans spend money like water, and restaurant proprietors and the like could not afford to disregard them. One evening, at a dance in a very well-known café some Americans objected to the presence of a Negro who was there with an Egyptian woman. After making some feeble protests, the proprietor gave in, and the Negro was turned out. Next morning there was a terrible hullabaloo and the café proprietor was hauled up before a Minister of the Government and threatened with prosecution. It had turned out that the offended Negro was the Ambassador of Haiti. People of that kind can usually get satisfaction, but most of us do not have the good fortune to be ambassadors, and the ordinary Indian, Negro or Chinese can only be protected against petty insult if other ordinary people are willing to exert themselves on his behalf. |
||
|
||
Copyright
The Estate of Eric Blair Reproduced here under educational Fair Use law |
||
|