George Orwell
As I Please
Tribune, 25 August 1944A certain amount of material
dealing with Burma and the Burma campaign has been passed on to me by the India-Burma
Association, which is an unofficial body representing the European communities in those
countries, and standing for a moderate policy based on the Cripps proposals.
The India-Burma Association complains with justice that Burma has
been extraordinarily ill-served in the way of publicity. Not
only has the general public no interest in Burma, in spite of its obvious importance from
many points of view, but the authorities have not even
succeeded in producing an attractive booklet which would tell people what the problems of
Burma are and how they are related to our own. Newspaper reports of the fighting in Burma,
from 1942 onwards, have been consistently uninformative, especially from a political point of view. As soon as the Japanese attack began the newspapers
and the B.B.C. adopted the practice of referring to all the inhabitants of Burma as
Burmans, even applying this name to the quite distinct and semi-savage peoples
of the far north. This is not only about as accurate as calling a Swede an Italian, but
masks the fact that the Japanese find their support mostly among the Burmese proper, the
minorities being largely pro-British. In the present campaign, when prisoners are taken,
the newspaper reports never state whether they are Japanese or whether they are Burmese
and Indian partisans a point of very great importance.
Almost all the books that have been published about the campaign
of 1942 are misleading. I know what I am talking about, because I have had most of them to
review. They have either been written by American journalists with no background knowledge
and a considerable anti-British bias, or by British officials who are on the defensive and
anxious to cover up everything discreditable. Actually, the British officials and military
men have been blamed for much that was not their fault, and the view of the Burma campaign
held by left-wingers in this country was almost as distorted as that held by the Blimps.
But this trouble arises because there is no official effort to publicize the truth. For to
my knowledge manuscripts do exist which give valuable information, but which, for
commercial reasons, cannot find publishers.
I can give three examples. In 1942 a young Burman who had
been a member of the Thakin (extreme Nationalist) party and had intrigued with the
Japanese fled to India, having changed his mind about the Japanese when he saw what their
rule was like. He wrote a short book which was published in India under the title of
What Happened in Burma and which was obviously authentic in the main. The Indian
Government in its negligent way sent exactly two copies to England. I tried to induce
various publishers to reissue it, but failed every time: they all gave the same reason
it was not worth wasting paper on a subject which the big public was not interested
in. Later a Major Enriquez, who had published various travel books dealing with Burma,
brought to England a diary covering the Burma campaign and the retreat into India. It was
an extremely revealing in places a disgracefully revealing document, but it
suffered the same fate as the other book. At the moment I am reading another manuscript
which gives valuable background material about Burmas history, its economic
conditions, its systems of land tenure, and so forth. But I would bet a small sum that it
wont be published either, at any rate until the paper shortage lets up.
If paper and money are not forthcoming for books of this kind
books which may spill a lot of beans but do help to counteract the lies put about
by Axis sympathizers
then the Government must not be surprised if the public knows nothing about Burma and
cares less. And what applies to Burma applies to scores of other important but neglected
subjects.
Meanwhile here is a suggestion. Whenever a document appears which
is not commercially saleable but which is likely to be useful to future historians, it
should be submitted to a committee set up by, for instance, the British Museum. If they
consider it historically valuable they should have the power to print a few copies and
store them for the use of scholars. At present a manuscript rejected by the commercial
publishers almost always ends up in the dustbin. How many possible correctives to accepted
lies must have perished in this way! |