As I Please
Tribune, 28 March 1947
have been reading with interest the February-March bulletin of Mass
Observation, which appears just ten years after this organization first came
into being. It is curious to remember with what hostility it was greeted at
the beginning. It was violently attacked in the New Statesman, for
instance, where Mr Stonier declared that the typical Mass Observer would
have ‘elephant ears, a loping walk and a permanent sore eye from looking
through keyholes’, or words to that effect. Another attacker was Mr Stephen
Spender. But on the whole the opposition to this or any other kind of
social survey comes from people of conservative
opinions, who often seem to be genuinely indignant at the idea of finding
out what the big public is thinking.
If asked why, they generally answer that what is discovered is of no interest, and that in any case any intelligent person always knows already what are the main trends of public opinion. Another argument is that social surveys are an interference with individual liberty and a first step towards totalitarianism. The Daily Express ran this line for several years and tried to laugh the small social survey unit instituted by the Ministry of Information out of existence by nicknaming it Cooper’s Snoopers. Of course, behind much of this opposition there lies a well-justified fear of finding that mass sentiment on many subjects is not conservative.
But some people do seem sincerely to feel that it is a bad thing for the government to know too much about what people are thinking, just as others feel that it is a kind of presumption when the government tries to educate public opinion. Actually you can’t have democracy unless both processes are at work. Democracy is only possible when the law-makers and administrators know what the masses want, and what they can be counted on to understand. If the present Government paid more attention to this last point, they would word some of their publicity differently. Mass Observation issued a report last week on the White Paper on the economic situation. They found, as usual, that the abstract words and phrases which are flung to and fro in official announcements mean nothing to countless ordinary citizens. Many people are even flummoxed by the word ‘assets’, which is thought to have something to do with ‘assist’!
The Mass Observation Bulletin gives some account of the methods its investigators use, but does not touch on a very important point, and that is the manner in which social surveys are financed. Mass Observation itself appears to keep going in a-hand-to-mouth way by publishing books and by undertaking specific jobs for the Government or for commercial organizations. Some of its best surveys, such as that dealing with the birthrate, were carried out for the Advertising Service Guild. The trouble with this method is that a subject only gets investigated if some large, wealthy organization happens to be interested in it. An obvious example is antisemitism, which I believe has never been looked into, or only in a very sketchy way. But antisemitism is only one variant of the great modern disease of nationalism. We know very little about the real causes of nationalism, and we might conceivably be on the way towards curing it if we knew more. But who is sufficiently interested to put up the thousands of pounds that an exhaustive survey would cost?
some weeks there has been correspondence in the Observer about the
persistence of ‘spit and polish’ in the armed forces. The last issue had
a good letter from someone who signed himself ‘Conscript’, describing
how he and his comrades were forced to waste their time in polishing brass,
blacking the rubber hoses on stirrup pumps with boot polish, scraping broom
handles with razor blades, and so on. But ‘Conscript’ then goes on to
say: ‘When an officer (a major) carried out routine reading of King’s
Regulations regarding venereal disease, he did not hesitate to add: ”There
is nothing to be ashamed of if you have the disease – it is quite natural.
But make sure that you report for treatment at once.” ’ I must say that
it seems to me strange, amid the other idiocies mentioned, to object to one
of the few sensible things in the army system, i.e. its straightforward
attitude towards venereal disease. We shall never be able to stamp out
syphilis and gonorrhoea until the stigma of sinfulness is removed from them.
When full conscription was introduced in the 1914–18 war it was discovered,
if I remember rightly, that nearly half the population suffered or had
suffered from some form of venereal disease, and this frightened the
authorities into taking a few precautions. During the inter-war years the
struggle against venereal disease languished, so far as the civilian
population went. There was provision for treatment of those already infected,
but the proposal to set up ‘early treatment centres’, as in the army,
was quelled by the puritans. Then came another war, with the increase in
venereal disease that war necessarily causes, and another attempt to deal
with the problem. The Ministry of Health posters are timid enough, but even
these would have provoked an outcry from the pious ones if military
necessity had not called them into being.
the last five minutes I have been gazing out of the window into the square,
keeping a sharp look-out for signs of spring. There is a thinnish patch in
the clouds with a faint hint of blue behind it, and on a sycamore tree there
are some things that look as if they might be buds. Otherwise it is still
winter. But don’t worry! Two days ago, after a careful search in Hyde
Park, I came on a hawthorn bush that was definitely in bud, and some birds,
though not actually singing, were making noises like an orchestra tuning up.
Spring is coming after all, and recent rumours that this was the beginning
of another Ice Age were unfounded. In only three weeks’ time we shall be
listening to the cuckoo, which usually gives tongue about the fourteenth of
April. Another three weeks after that, and we shall be basking under blue
skies, eating ices off barrows and neglecting to lay up fuel for next winter.
shaws be sheen and swards full fair,
woodwele sang and would not cease,
But what exactly was the woodwele? The Oxford Dictionary seems to suggest that it was the woodpecker, which is not a notable songster, and I should be interested to know whether it can be identified with some more probable bird.
The Estate of Eric Blair
Reproduced here under educational Fair Use law